WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners. By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles. Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime. |
Natalie Elphicke says sorry for backing 'naughty Tory' sex attacker exWoman sentenced to 55 years for death of longtime friend stabbed nearly 500 timesMother's Day is a sad reminder for the mothers of Mexico's over 100,000 missing peopleXander Schauffele shoots 67, leads by 4 over Rory McIlroy, Jason Day at Wells Fargo ChampionshipDeath toll in bombings at displacement camps in eastern Congo rises to at least 35Hailey Bieber and husband Justin's pregnancy reveal sends AAgricultural cooperation producing fruitful yieldsKansas' governor has killed proposed limits on foreign land ownershipJeremy Vine sues Joey Barton for calling him a 'big bike nonce'I'm an American living in the UK... here's why universal healthcare is not all roses